Uncategorized

Australian Councils Have NO Legal Right To Charge Rates.

Australian Councils Have NO Legal Right To Charge Rates.

 http://australiansurvivalandpreppers.blogspot.com.au/2015/02/australian-councils-have-no-legal-right.html

Local Government Illegal

People all over Australia are waking up to the fact that the 1988 Referendum denied an attempt to legalise local governments.
The High Court of Australia ruled that “State Governments could not raise ANY TAX” and because of this the ‘State Excise on Fuel, Tobacco & Alcohol’ was removed.
It can be clearly seen that the authors of the Constitution were not allowing for any Parliament other than the Federal Parliament to impose a tax. Therefore, the only land rates/tax that can be imposed within Australia is one imposed by the Federal Parliament through the Commissioner for Taxation.
Unless we receive a “Rates Notice” from the ‘Commissioner for Taxation it is INVALID and UNLAWFUL.Clearly, in sections 51 and 52 of the Constitution and from the Constitutional Commission (1985 – 1988) report thatthe power of taxation is held exclusively by the Federal Parliament.
Section 109 of the Australian Constitution states:
“When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.”
Because State Governments are subject to the Commonwealth Parliament and also subject to the Commonwealth Constitution, the states cannot lawfully impose a ‘Land Tax’, ‘only the Commonwealth Government holds such taxation authority’.
Unless the State governments can present the legal authority from the High Court of Australia; or from the Federal Government giving authority to raise taxes, citizens are not legally obliged to pay any ‘rates’ imposed by their local council/government. It doesn’t matter what they call themselves, local governments have no legal authority to impose any taxes, and house rates are clearly a tax on the value of the property.
The letter below shows what you can do as a citizen. Address it to your State Minister for local government and stop the illegal taxation being imposed under the name ‘Rates’:
———————————————————-
*NOTICE TO MINISTER*
*THIS IS THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE*
         Hon [MINISTER’S NAME]
Minister for [MINISTER’S PORTFOLIO]
[MINISTER’S ADDRESS]
Ref: Local Governments Validity.                              Date:                             2013
Dear Minister,
Statement #1:
The High Court of Australia ruled that “State Governments could not raise ANY TAX”.
It can be clearly seen that the authors of the Constitution were not allowing for any Parliament other than the Federal Parliament to impose a tax. Therefore, the only land rates/tax that can be imposed within Australia is one imposed by the Federal Parliament through the Commissioner for Taxation.
Unless we receive a “Rates Notice” from the ‘Commissioner for Taxation it is INVALID and UNLAWFUL.
Clearly in sections 51 and 52 of the Constitution and from the Constitutional Commission (1985 – 1988) report thatthe power of taxation is held exclusively by the Federal Parliament.
Since the State Parliament has no powers under the Australian Constitution to impose taxes, which has been, determined where The High Court of Australia ruled, “State Governments could not raise ANY TAX” and therefore, “Land Tax” is unlawful.  The state government will have to lodge an appeal to the High Court of Australia to overturn the previous decision before they can legally impose such tax upon the people or have the Federal Government hold a referendum to alter the constitution.
Section 109 of the Australian Constitution states:
“When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.”
Because the Parliament of [STATE] is subject to the Commonwealth Parliament and also subject to the Commonwealth Constitution, the states cannot lawfully impose a ‘Land Tax’, ‘only the Commonwealth Government holds such taxation authority’.
Until the State of [NAME] can provide a legal authority either from the High Court of Australia; or from the Federal Government giving authority to raise taxes, to comply with your intentions would be in breach of the law itself, that you are bound to uphold. When you present such legal authority we will certainly provide the information you request.
Statement #2:
COUNCILS ILLEGAL UNDER THE CONSTITUTION
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ARE ILLEGAL UNDER THE COMMONWEALTH CONSTITUTION DETERMINED BY TWO REFERENDUMS
 18 May 1974 & 3 September 1988
The Australian Electoral Commission on their CD “Australian Referendums 1906—1999” have advised the following points:
  1. “Under the Australian Commonwealth Constitution any powers not delegated to the Commonwealth are the prerogative of the States UNLESS THEY ARE SPECIFICALLY DENIED.”
  1. The Referendum on 18th of May 1974
Q4. Local Government Bodies – The fourth proposal sought to amend section 51 of the Constitution to give the Federal Government power to give financial Assistance to lend and borrow money for any local government body.
  1. The people voted NO.
  1. Q4. The referendum was NOT carried.
One State recorded a YES vote (NSW), however; nationally only 46.85% of electors voted YES.
TODAY WE HAVE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FUNDING LOCAL GOVERNMENT DIRECTLY IN CONTRAVENTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
  1. The Referendum on 3rd of September 1988
                Q3: Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 1988.
Q3. To alter the Constitution to recognise local government
  1. The people voted NO.
  1. Q3. The referendum was NOT carried.
No States recorded a YES vote. However; nationally only 33.62% of electors voted YES.
  1. The legislative proposal was, “119A. – Each State shall provide for the establishment and continuance of a system of local government, with local government bodies elected in
Accordance with the laws of the State and empowered to administer, and to make bylaws, for their respective areas in accordance with the laws of the State.”
  1. Unlike a plebiscite, a referendum is binding on the government.
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT RECOGNITION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT IS IN DIRECT CONTRAVENTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
The Commonwealth Government is funding Local Governments directly contrary to the Constitution.
All local government has been constitutionally illegal since 3-9-88 when there was a referendum to incorporate local Government into the Australian Constitution.
This means that all local government authorities now operate without a lawful head of power. The legal bind is that states cannot retain legislation that condones any form of local government.
Thus all levels of government are operating illegally ignoring the instructions of the people.  If the government will not obey the Constitutional Will of The People and thus democratic law, why should the people obey parliamentary law?  The precedence has been set.
FURTHERMORE Local Government Rates are deemed a tax thus no GST is applicable.
Clearly in sections 51 and 52 of the Constitution and from the Constitutional Commission (1985 – 1988) report thatthe power of taxation is held exclusively by the Federal Parliament.  No states have authority under the constitution to impose a tax. Clearly in sections 51 and 52 of the Constitution and from the Constitutional Commission (1985 – 1988) report that “The power of taxation is held exclusively by the Federal Parliament.” Thus Local Government Rates being a tax are unlawful and in breach of the constitution.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT IS NOT RECOGNISED WITHIN THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION AND WAS REJECTED AT REFERENDUM OF THE AUSTRALIAN PEOPLE IN SEPTEMBER 1988 THEREFORE LOCAL COUNCIL HAS NO LAWFUL BASE
 Thus Councils Should Be Dismissed And Local Government Department Administrators Appointed Permanently.
1.       In no section within the Australian Constitution is there provision for the Federal or State Parliament to establish a third level of government without the permission of the people via a Federal Referendum.
2.       The High Court of Australia ruled that “State Governments could not raise ANY TAX”, and because of this the ‘State Excise on Fuel, Tobacco & Alcohol’ was removed.
3.       It can be clearly seen that the authors of the Constitution were not allowing for any Parliament other than the Federal Parliament to impose a tax. Therefore, the only land rates tax that can be imposed within Australia is one imposed by the Federal Parliament through the Commissioner for Taxation.
4.       Unless we receive a “Rates Notice” from the ‘Commissioner for Taxation it is INVALID and UNLAWFUL.
5.       Clearly in sections 51 and 52 of the Constitution and from the Constitutional Commission (1985 – 1988) report that the power of taxation is held exclusively by the Federal Parliament.
6.       The Courts of Australia have long held that council rates are a tax. Yet, under the Australian Constitution, the Parliaments of the States do not have the power of taxation.
7.       “John Winston Howard, Peter Howard Costello & ’Commissioner for Taxation’ Michael Joseph Carmody all stated before the introduction of the infamous “Goods and Services Tax”,
        Quote:  “Local government Council Rates will attract no GST because Council Rates are a tax and we can’t tax a tax”.
8.       The organizations known as ‘local government’ did not exist at the time of the federation of the states into a commonwealth.
9.       A ‘rateable person within the meaning of the local government act 1995’ did not exist at the time of the federation of the states into a commonwealth. It can be seen then, that since ‘local government’ did not exist at the time of Federation, then there can be no continuance of local government law.
10.   Since ‘local government’ did not exist at the time of Federation, then there can be no continuance of ‘local government’ law. Similarly, as ‘local government land rates tax’ did not exist at the time of Federation there can be no continuance of ‘local government land rates tax’ from that time to now.
11.   Following a recommendation of the Constitutional Commission of Inquiry (1985 – 1988) a Referendum was held in September 1988. (“The Constitutional Commission found that there was no basis in law, contained within the Constitution for the provision of ‘Local Government”). They found that barely 50% of the populationeven knew of the existence of the Constitution, let alone its contents, and that only a few percent of those under 25 years of age knew of its existence at all.)
12.   Question 3 from the referendum was:  A Proposed Law; ‘To alter the Constitution to recognise local government.’  Do you approve of this alteration?
13.   The specific (federal Referendum) proposal was:-
(3) Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 1988…. 119A, “Each state shall provide for the establishment and continuance of a system of local government, with local government bodies elected in accordance with the laws of the state, and empowered to administer, and make by-laws for, their respective areas in accordance with the laws of the state”.
14.   It was recognized that the Parliaments of the States did not have the power to establish a third tier of government via ‘local government’ and an amendment to the Constitution was necessary for them to obtain these powers.
15.   If the Constitution had to be altered to allow for the establishment of ‘local government’, before there could be a continuance of ‘local government from the time of federation, then it is clear that these powers did not exist at the time of the Federation of the States into a Commonwealth.
16.   Therefore, if the Constitution had to be altered to allow for the “establishment and continuance” of ‘local government’ these powers did not exist at the time of Federation or sections 106 to 108 of the constitution would have applied and the constitution would not have had to be altered.
17.   For the Constitution to be able to be changed, there must be a majority, (either for or against), in each state and a favourable majority must be returned in a majority of States.
The Australian Electoral Commission advice:
“Referendum results – 3 September 1988”
“(41) Local Government”, being totally reject by 3 084 678 votes of the Australian people.
“Question 3”.
“A Proposed Law: To alter the Constitution to recognise local government.”
“Do you approve this proposed alteration?”
“The Constitution recognises government at the Commonwealth and State levels but makes no mention of local government. Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 1988 sought to give such constitutional recognition to local government.”
18.   “Obtained majority in no State and an overall minority of 3 084 678 votes.”
19.   Therefore the continuance of Local Government in defiance of the referendum vote of the people is unlawful?  Thus the Minister would be acting in accordance with the Australian people’s referendum results if he dismissed the Tweed Shire Council.  In fact it is encumbered upon him explicitly follow the instruction of people’s referendum and dismiss all councils.
20.   No other conclusion can be derived from this result other than that Local government was not legally recognized by the people of Australia, who are the Government of Australia through their agents the Parliaments.
21.   The Parliament of the State did not have these powers before the Referendum, and they were most certainly prohibited from having them after the Referendum.
22.   This was confirmed by the Parliament of NSW Legislative Council General Purpose Standing Committee (No 5), Report 19, Local Government Amalgamations, December 2003 which states on page 51, at 4.78: “Local Government is not recognized in the Australian Constitution. In 1974 and 1988 constitutional recognition of local government was considered in referenda to change the constitution but neither referendum was successful.”
23.   The members of the various Parliaments of the States and the Commonwealth are the elected representatives of the people of Australia. They are not there as representatives of the Parliaments, but as elected servants of the people. Twice, in 1974 and in 1988 the people of Australia (the Government) told their elected representatives that they did not wish to constitutionally recognize local government.
24.   Since the people do not wish to recognize ‘local government’, and since the Constitution does not recognize or grant the power to establish a third level of government, then under Section 109 of the Constitution it was illegal for the Parliament of Western Australia to enact the Local Government Act of 1995.
25.   The 1988 Referendum was a public act under the Federal Constitution. Sections 106 and 108 subject the Constitutions of the States to the over-riding authority of the Federal Constitution and Section 118 requires that full faith and credit be given throughout the Commonwealth of Australia to the laws and public acts and records of every State. If full faith and credit is given, there appears to be NO LEGAL WAY any States can overturn the specific outcome of a Federal Referendum
26.   The Referendum (Constitution Alteration) Act of 1906-1973 is a Commonwealth of Australia Act. The Schedule of the Referendum Act provides the wording of the “Writ for Referendum” and includes the words:
27.   “We (the Electorate) command that you (the parliament) cause a proposed law entitled… ……… to be submitted, according to law, in each State to the electors qualified to vote for the election of Members of the House of Representatives” (for each of the six states). It is clear that a “Writ” directs that a Federal Referendum must be by way of a vote state by state. This has the same effect as a state referendum, but under the Federal Act, by doing so invokes Section 109 of the Australian Constitution as an authority that over-rides any inconsistency in the legislation of the States.
28.   Since the parliament of Western Australia has no powers under the Australian Constitution to create a Third Tier of Government, and since they were twice told by the people they serve that the people did not wish to recognize Local Government, then the enactment of the Local Government Act of 1995 was illegal.
29.   THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT OF 1995 HAS NO BASIS EITHER CONSTITUTIONALLY OR LEGALLY.
30.   The Constitution was formatted to protect the Australian people from a number of things, and also to give the people of Australia the ability of Self Determination of Government.
NOWHERE DOES IT PERMIT THE PARLIAMENTS, OR THE JUDICIARY, TO OPERATE OUTSIDE THESE GUIDELINES.
PLEASE PROVIDE PROOF OF CLAIM TO ME WITHIN 21 DAYS.
If you can not provide proof of claim to the following 2 statements, then I hold no other view as a Sovereign Subject under Queen Elizabeth the Second and the Federal Constitution that these 2 statements hold true and correct and under the Law of the    Land, All Local Governments in Australia must from this time going forward cease and desist Immediately until Federal Administer can be appointed.
Yours truly,
Name:                                                    of the Family
Signature                                                            date:
Address:
*THIS DOCUMENT IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD*

http://www.restoreaustralia.org.au/local-government-illegal/

Molecular Biologist Explains How THC Kills Cancer Completely

Molecular Biologist Explains How THC Kills Cancer Completely.

(originally written by Christina Sarich)

From Compultense University in Madrid, Spain, Dr. Christina Sanchez has been studying the anti-tumor effects of THC, the main psychoactive component of cannabis for over a decade.

She delivers sound information that explains exactly how THC kills cancer cells entirely – without adverse effects to healthy cells.

Her research is an addition to other’s work, such as British scientist, Wai Liu, an oncologist at the University of London’s St. George’s medical school. Liu’s research also reveals how THC has ‘potent anti-cancer activity,’ and can significantly ‘target and switch off’ pathways that allow cancers to grow.

Liu points out that pharmaceutical companies spend billions on drugs that do the very same thing, while the cannabis plant does it naturally.

In the following video, Dr. Sanchez explains exactly how THC does the dirty work of eliminating cancer cells by activating the body’s own cannabinoid receptors, creating endocannabinoids.

What’s more, is cannabis can do this without any psychoactive effects.

“There’s quite a lot of cancers that should respond quite nicely to these cannabis agents,” Liu said. “If you talk about a drug company that spent billions of pounds trying to develop these new drugs that target these pathways, cannabis does exactly the same thing – or certain elements of cannabis compounds do exactly the same thing – so you have something that is naturally produced which impacts the same pathways that these fantastic drugs that cost billions also work on.”

This comes at an important time when states are legalizing medical marijuana and the federal government is receiving pressure to de-list cannabis as an illegal drug – an archaic and erroneous definition of a plant which the Feds say ‘has no medicinal value’, even though they hold numerous patents on the plant. The feds are still fighting marijuana, despite having numerous patents on the plant.

Patent No. 6,630,507, for example, is for cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants. Could this be why they are dragging their feet on declassifying this valuable plant?

In fact, three scientists from the Department of Health and Human Services said in the abstract — or summary — of their findings submitted with the patent application:

“The cannabinoids are found to have particular application as neuroproectants, for example in limiting neurological damage following ischemic insults, such as stroke or trauma, or the treatment of neurological diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and HIV dementia.”

Surely they knew it could treat cancer too.

In Hindu texts cannabis was known as ‘sacred grass.’ It has also been used in traditional Chinese medicine for centuries. Cannabis can replace toxic medications, and drastically reduce pain. Dr. Sanchez’s studies just add to the age-old wisdom surrounding the medicinal use of this phenomenal plant.

sources:



Read more: http://dailyhealthpost.com/molecular-biologist-explains-how-thc-kills-cancer-completely/#ixzz3OUjN7AtN 
Follow us: @dailyhealthpost on Twitter | dailyhealthpost on Facebook

Truth in QLD elections

DR DAVID PASCOE WRITES ABOUT THE NASCAR AWARD – AND WHY WE CHOOSE TO STICK IT UP THE POLITICIANS There are a few readers out there who apparently lie awake at night and worry that we are being too mean to all the lovely people at the LNP. That we’re throwing lollies in the playground and that it’s just not nice. Sarcastic and nasty and horrible, in fact. They suggest that we need to go back to being nice about everyone (except the banks) so they don't have to choke on their wheat-bix every morning. Well, in the grand tradition of Private Eye and Spectator and a few other great satirical magazines, we can assure you that we are never going to play nice. We are going to tell the truth. If it was good enough for the Washington Post back in the days when Bernstein and Woodward has a hunch about a certain American President and were backed up by their editor Ben Bradlee, then its good enough for us. Well, here’s the thing. We happen to know what this Seeney / Newman Government has really done to the people of Queensland. They’ve lost their rights – minor things like the rights of ownership, the rights to object to having a mine put on their farm, their basic human rights to water, which is rapidly being stolen from them (google galilee mining and artesian basin if you don’t want to believe us ) and the fact anyone west of the Great Divide is earmarked for eventual extermination (google regional growth in Queensland if you don't want to believe us) . It’s only the voters in the South East Corner that will elect the next State Government - so they rest of us might as well just bugger off. In the meantime, we’d like to assure you that we were equally nasty about the Bligh Government and the wanton destruction they had caused right across Queensland – but most of all, in the bush where nobody could see it – and nobody was ever going to report it, thanks to certain political relationships with certain Corporate Media. But you don’t know that because we weren’t running a public Facebook page at the time. So here’s a little surprise for you. We don’t really dislike the LNP or the Labor Party at all. There are some very good and decent and hardworking people in both parties that went into politics for all the right reasons. There are still a few of them left in there battling away. They are mostly powerless and voiceless and deeply frustrated at what they know is happening, and we salute them. The real problem we have, however, is with the party system – and the fact that the backroom of both parties in controlled by faceless Corporations and a handful of extremely rich individuals who, though their massive party donations and influence, are effectively the real puppeteers of politics. So here’s the brutal truth: the politicians elected to represent the party do not have the freedom to vote according to their conscience or their community wishes if that happens to be in conflict with the party policy. And who shapes the party policy? Well, you guessed it. So those politicians who do vote against ‘party policy’ are eventually ‘brought into line’ or worse, simply disendorsed by the Party. With this kind of behaviour, the party has no self-regulation in its policy decision making because it is controlled by the back room boys. What they want is what is good for them – and not necessarily good for the people of Australia, or good for Queensland as the case may be. And what the backroom power brokers are doing with their craven lust for power and money – and what is good for their corporation - is simply destroying our people, our communities and our very way of life. We are writing this FB page for one single reason: not because we want some fancy life in politics in the flash pinstriped suit with the big white Comm car and people bowing and calling us Sir. On the contrary, we want to see our State being run by its people - for its people. We want to see truth and fairness in government again, we want to see basic process practised in government again, we want to see an end to the mining mates scandals and the unforgivable acts of corruption that are now regarded as perfectly normal behaviour. We want to see our people prosper and grow - and most of all, we want to see our young people have real jobs again. Right now, Queensland has the highest youth unemployment rate in Australia - and we happen to know they are now secretly planning to import cargo loads of cheap Chinese, Indian and Korean labour for the mines and sneak them in to isolated airports in the middle of the night - and right behind our backs. We cannot allow Governments to run two rules in this state - one rule for the rich and one rule for the rest of us. That's not what democracy is all about - and that's not what Queensland is all about. We cannot continue to stand back and watch our people being destroyed and treated as badly as they are being treated right now. We have worked with an large team of brilliant and dedicated Australians who love their country and love their state so much they have devoted nearly every available hour in trying to save it. The evidence they have turned up about what has really gone on here is truly devastating for the long term welfare of our state. And in the case of Queensland, our investigative teams first needed to expose what has happened here before they can even begin to try to save it. Well, we have news for Premier Newman and all his mining mates: this is NOT a mining state - THIS IS A PEOPLE STATE. And we will stand up for our people - no matter what it takes. So step up and come on board. It's only 21 days before an election that will decide the fate of the Queensland we love. We have a lot of work to do. regards David Photos: some Nascar driver doing the Nascar thing! (at least he is wearing who really sponsors him - unlike our politicians!) Special credits: thanks to Graham McConnell for a brilliant idea.
Dr David Pascoe BVSc PhD OVH Repro

DR DAVID PASCOE WRITES ABOUT THE NASCAR AWARD – AND WHY WE CHOOSE TO STICK IT UP THE POLITICIANS

There are a few readers out there who apparently lie awake at night and worry that we are being too mean to all the lovely people at the LNP.

That we’re throwing lollies in the playground and that it’s just not nice. Sarcastic and nasty and horrible, in fact. They suggest that we need to go back to being nice about everyone (except the banks) so they don’t have to choke on their wheat-bix every morning.

Well, in the grand tradition of Private Eye and Spectator and a few other great satirical magazines, we can assure you that we are never going to play nice. We are going to tell the truth.

If it was good enough for the Washington Post back in the days when Bernstein and Woodward has a hunch about a certain American President and were backed up by their editor Ben Bradlee, then its good enough for us.

Well, here’s the thing. We happen to know what this Seeney / Newman Government has really done to the people of Queensland.

They’ve lost their rights – minor things like the rights of ownership, the rights to object to having a mine put on their farm, their basic human rights to water, which is rapidly being stolen from them (google galilee mining and artesian basin if you don’t want to believe us ) and the fact anyone west of the Great Divide is earmarked for eventual extermination (google regional growth in Queensland if you don’t want to believe us) .

It’s only the voters in the South East Corner that will elect the next State Government – so they rest of us might as well just bugger off.

In the meantime, we’d like to assure you that we were equally nasty about the Bligh Government and the wanton destruction they had caused right across Queensland – but most of all, in the bush where nobody could see it – and nobody was ever going to report it, thanks to certain political relationships with certain Corporate Media.

But you don’t know that because we weren’t running a public Facebook page at the time.

So here’s a little surprise for you. We don’t really dislike the LNP or the Labor Party at all.

There are some very good and decent and hardworking people in both parties that went into politics for all the right reasons.

There are still a few of them left in there battling away. They are mostly powerless and voiceless and deeply frustrated at what they know is happening, and we salute them.

The real problem we have, however, is with the party system – and the fact that the backroom of both parties in controlled by faceless Corporations and a handful of extremely rich individuals who, though their massive party donations and influence, are effectively the real puppeteers of politics.

So here’s the brutal truth: the politicians elected to represent the party do not have the freedom to vote according to their conscience or their community wishes if that happens to be in conflict with the party policy.

And who shapes the party policy? Well, you guessed it.

So those politicians who do vote against ‘party policy’ are eventually ‘brought into line’ or worse, simply disendorsed by the Party.

With this kind of behaviour, the party has no self-regulation in its policy decision making because it is controlled by the back room boys.

What they want is what is good for them – and not necessarily good for the people of Australia, or good for Queensland as the case may be.

And what the backroom power brokers are doing with their craven lust for power and money – and what is good for their corporation – is simply destroying our people, our communities and our very way of life.

We are writing this info for one single reason: not because we want some fancy life in politics in the flash pinstriped suit with the big white Comm car and people bowing and calling us Sir.

On the contrary, we want to see our State being run by its people – for its people.

We want to see truth and fairness in government again, we want to see basic process practised in government again, we want to see an end to the mining mates scandals and the unforgivable acts of corruption that are now regarded as perfectly normal behaviour.

We want to see our people prosper and grow – and most of all, we want to see our young people have real jobs again.

Right now, Queensland has the highest youth unemployment rate in Australia – and we happen to know they are now secretly planning to import cargo loads of cheap Chinese, Indian and Korean labour for the mines and sneak them in to isolated airports in the middle of the night – and right behind our backs.

We cannot allow Governments to run two rules in this state – one rule for the rich and one rule for the rest of us. That’s not what democracy is all about – and that’s not what Queensland is all about.

We cannot continue to stand back and watch our people being destroyed and treated as badly as they are being treated right now.

We have worked with an large team of brilliant and dedicated Australians who love their country and love their state so much they have devoted nearly every available hour in trying to save it.

The evidence they have turned up about what has really gone on here is truly devastating for the long term welfare of our state.

And in the case of Queensland, our investigative teams first needed to expose what has happened here before they can even begin to try to save it.

Well, we have news for Premier Newman and all his mining mates: this is NOT a mining state – THIS IS A PEOPLE STATE.

And we will stand up for our people – no matter what it takes.

So step up and come on board.

It’s only 21 days before an election that will decide the fate of the Queensland we love.

We have a lot of work to do.

regards

David

Photos: some Nascar driver doing the Nascar thing above! (at least he is wearing who really sponsors him – unlike our politicians!)

What can I say about the photo below? Hmmm This who is the sponsor and who the LNP really work for. Not the people of QLD

ITS NASCAR NEWMAN! THE BIG MAN STEPS OUT WITH HIS SPONSORS DISPLAYED. IT'S JUST GREAT TO SEE HOW THE CORPORATES REALLY GET BEHIND THEIR MAN. WE CAN-DO ANY DEAL YOU WANT. (our thanks to the wild team)
Dr David Pascoe BVSc PhD OVH Repro

ITS NASCAR NEWMAN!

THE BIG MAN STEPS OUT WITH HIS SPONSORS DISPLAYED.

IT’S JUST GREAT TO SEE HOW THE CORPORATES REALLY GET BEHIND THEIR MAN.

WE CAN-DO ANY DEAL YOU WANT.

(our thanks to the wild team)

Special credits: thanks to Graham McConnell for a brilliant idea.

This is an independent we all need in all our electorates Peter Wellington

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alan talks to Heather about her battle against corruption in Queensland – A MUST Listen

Alan talks to Heather about her battle against corruption in Queensland Read more at http://www.2gb.com/audioplayer/43916#CVPPTuiOcFm0pylq.99

this is very informative and is really worth a listen.

She was terrorised with helicopters flying and staying over her house at midnight are just one of the things that has been done to her.